OFF DUTY LOCKS

Offensive Power Rankings

Teams ranked by offensive rating — points scored per 100 possessions — from the same verified statistics the model runs on. Offense only: these rankings carry no defensive measure.

Rank 1, Indiana Fever 26-14 114.1 offensive rating 85.0 Pace 97.0 PTS/G
Rank 2, Minnesota Lynx 31-9 112.2 offensive rating 81.3 Pace 91.3 PTS/G
Rank 3, Las Vegas Aces 27-13 111.4 offensive rating 81.4 Pace 90.6 PTS/G
Rank 4, New York Liberty 24-16 109.8 offensive rating 81.8 Pace 89.8 PTS/G
Rank 5, Dallas Wings 24-16 109.2 offensive rating 81.5 Pace 89.0 PTS/G
Rank 6, Atlanta Dream 26-14 107.7 offensive rating 84.3 Pace 90.8 PTS/G
Rank 7, Golden State Valkyries 29-11 106.9 offensive rating 77.3 Pace 82.6 PTS/G
Rank 8, Portland Fire 16-24 105.2 offensive rating 82.3 Pace 86.6 PTS/G
Rank 9, Toronto Tempo 11-29 104.5 offensive rating 82.5 Pace 86.2 PTS/G
Rank 10, Los Angeles Sparks 15-25 104.1 offensive rating 83.9 Pace 87.3 PTS/G
Rank 11, Phoenix Mercury 14-26 103.0 offensive rating 81.7 Pace 84.2 PTS/G
Rank 12, Washington Mystics 24-16 102.4 offensive rating 80.9 Pace 82.8 PTS/G
Rank 13, Chicago Sky 15-25 102.4 offensive rating 84.6 Pace 86.7 PTS/G
Rank 14, Seattle Storm 8-32 99.3 offensive rating 83.5 Pace 82.8 PTS/G
Rank 15, Connecticut Sun 10-30 95.9 offensive rating 82.3 Pace 79.0 PTS/G

Bars compare offensive rating across the season field only — the scale runs 95.9 to 114.1 points per 100 possessions, not from zero.

Reading these numbers

Offensive rating

Points scored per 100 possessions, computed as points ÷ possessions × 100, where possessions = FGA − OREB + TOV + 0.44 × FTA. It measures scoring efficiency, not overall team strength.

Recent form

The difference between a team's last-7 offensive rating and its season rating. Positive means the team has scored more efficiently lately than it has all year. Compare it against the league figure in the note above — form moves league-wide, not just per team.

Pace

Estimated possessions per game. High pace raises both teams' point totals without implying either is more efficient, which is why the total and the rating are read together.